Advertisement

Can You Spot Lung Cancer Early?

Can You Spot Lung Cancer Early?

Lung cancer often isn't diagnosed until its later stages. Here's how to improve your odds of catching it early.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women in the United States—but up to 90 percent of lung cancer cases are preventable.

That’s because the leading cause of lung cancer is smoking cigarettes. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the habit is associated with up to 90 percent of lung cancer diagnoses.

“If you smoke a pack a day for thirty or forty years, you're twenty times more likely than somebody who's never smoked to develop lung cancer,” says Erev Tubb, MD, chair of medicine and chief of hematology and oncology at Saint Francis Healthcare in Wilmington, Delaware.

The good news? Quitting smoking can reduce your risk of developing lung cancer. And it’s never too late to quit.

“For years, the mortality rates for lung cancer were rising dramatically, but smoking cessation is actually the reason why they’re starting to go down,” explains Dr. Tubb.

But smoking isn’t the only risk factor for lung cancer. Exposure to certain environmental hazards—like radon, asbestos and air pollution, not to mention secondhand smoke—can also play a role, as can other factors including a family history of the disease.

Know the signs of lung cancer
If you’re at an increased risk of developing lung cancer, it’s important to become familiar with certain signs and symptoms of the disease, such as:

  • Persistent or worsening cough
  • Cough that produces blood or rust-colored mucus
  • Chest pain that worsens when breathing deeply, coughing or laughing
  • Shortness of breath or new onset of wheezing
  • Hoarseness
  • Fatigue or weakness
  • Persistent lung infections like bronchitis or pneumonia

There are a number of additional symptoms that may not seem related to lung cancer that may also be indicators. These include:

  • Decreased appetite
  • Weight loss
  • Bone pain
  • Blood clots

Making a diagnosis can be difficult
The trick is, these general warning signs—and even the respiratory symptoms—are not necessarily specific to lung cancer.

“The majority of people with lung cancer have a cough, some are short of breath, some may have chest discomfort,” says Tubb. “But these are all things that can be found in conditions other than lung cancer.” For example, many of these symptoms could be related to asthma, pneumonia or even a cold.

What’s more, by the time many of these symptoms arise in a lung cancer patient, usually it’s an advanced form of cancer.

“Our bodies have great respiratory capacity to the point where it really has to be decreased by a significant amount before you start feeling short of breath,” says Tubb.

And therein lies the problem with relying exclusively on symptoms to make a diagnosis.

“By the time you’ve lost 40 percent of your lung capacity,” he says, “the disease has already had a chance to advance significantly and you may not feel symptoms like shortness of breath until you’ve lost that capacity.”

On top of that, the lungs have very few nerve endings, which means if a cancerous tumor grows in the lungs, it may go undetected because it typically won’t cause any noticeable pain or discomfort.

Aside from quitting smoking and avoiding the type of environmental exposures that can increase your risk, the best thing you can do for your health is to identify lung cancer before you even start to experience symptoms. The earlier the cancer is detected, the better chance you have for successful treatment.

The value of screening for lung cancer
The good news is that screening for lung cancer may help with making a diagnosis. But there are a few caveats worth keeping in mind.

One large clinical trial known as the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was conducted to investigate the best screening method to help reduce lung cancer-related deaths.

“Up to this point, there was really no good way to screen for lung cancer,” says Tubb. “Physicians would do chest X-rays, but there was no clear evidence that chest X-rays detected anything except for later-stage cancers.”

The NLST compared the effects of computed tomography (CT) scans with those of X-rays. The initial results, released in November 2010, found that the CT scans provided more detailed imaging and were better at detecting small abnormalities in the lungs than X-rays. The study authors concluded that the scans could help lower the risk of dying from lung cancer.

These CT scans aren’t perfect, however. While they can detect something very small, there’s a chance that whatever is detected may not even be related to lung cancer. This can eventually lead to additional, potentially unnecessary testing.

And most lung masses that are detected in CT scans are not actually cancer—they’re simply a sign of a previous infection, scar tissue or the like. This is known as a false positive result. The only way of knowing for sure is to undergo a follow-up scan or additional testing.

“Say the CT scan finds something that’s 5 millimeters, which is very small,” Tubb says. “You can’t actually biopsy a 5-millimeter lesion. You have to wait a little bit to see if it goes from 5 to 10 millimeters from one scan to the next.”

CT scans are thus not often a “one and done,” explains Tubb.

“If a spot is seen at 5 millimeters, it could be benign or it could be malignant,” he says. “There’s no way to determine that on the spot. So, what’s done is usually a follow-up scan at a shorter interval than the usual screening test to see if it’s grown or not.”

It’s important, therefore, to coordinate your care with a surgeon in order to determine the optimal timeframe for removing a suspicious nodule as opposed to proceeding with a biopsy, says Tubb.

Who should get screened?
Because lung cancer screening is not necessarily beneficial for everyone, whether or not you should undergo screening really depends on your individual health history.

“The number one thing you can do is talk to your doctor about how they can help you,” says Tubb. Your doctor will then work with you to discuss potential next steps for evaluation and screening that are suited to your circumstances.

According to the American Cancer Society, good candidates for lung cancer screening are those who are at a high risk for developing lung cancer. This typically includes those between the ages of 55 and 74 who also:

  • Smoke cigarettes currently or have only quit within the past 15 years
  • Have a history of smoking the equivalent of one pack of cigarettes a day for 30 years
  • Have been informed of the benefits, limitations and potential risks of CT scans for lung cancer screening and have access to a facility that provides screening and treatment

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has similar screening recommendations that extend to adults ages 55 to 80 with a history of smoking.

In the end, if you are ultimately diagnosed with lung cancer, the earlier you catch it, the more curable it may be.

“Even in advanced stages,” says Tubb, “there is hope for longer-term survival based on good responses to newer therapies for lung cancer.”

My Story: Jessi and Lung Cancer
My Story: Jessi and Lung Cancer
Non-small cell lung cancer is a type of lung cancer that can affect both smokers and nonsmokers. In this video, Jessi bravely shares her lung cancer d...
Read More
What are the stages of lung cancer?
Dr. Jay M. Lee, MDDr. Jay M. Lee, MD
The stages of lung cancer are I through IV. The stage is determined by the tumor size, location and ...
More Answers
What are my chances of surviving lung cancer?
The Society of Thoracic SurgeonsThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Your chances of surviving lung cancer have improved over time. A retrospective study of people from ...
More Answers
Does a PET Scan That Shows Lung Nodules Mean Cancer?
Does a PET Scan That Shows Lung Nodules Mean Cancer?