ADVERTISMENT
Sharecare Professional

Dx Dialogues: Multiple Myeloma

Patient selection for cellular immunotherapies in multiple myeloma: Identifying optimal candidates and managing the pre-treatment interval

Strategic approaches to CAR T-cell and bispecific antibody therapy utilization in relapsed/refractory disease

Patient selection for cellular immunotherapies in multiple myeloma: Identifying optimal candidates and managing the pre-treatment interval

Written by Stephanie Neary, PhD, MPA, PA-C. Medically reviewed in November 2025.

Cellular immunotherapies have transformed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treatment, delivering favorable response rates in heavily pretreated populations.1 Despite these achievements, optimal implementation into clinical practice requires thoughtful patient selection, comprehensive evaluation of prior treatments, and effective disease control during the pre-infusion interval.2

Ideal candidates demonstrate preserved functional status, no evidence of severe organ dysfunction, and a disease burden that is manageable during treatment preparation.1,2 Eligibility also depends on the ability to tolerate potential delays between apheresis and infusion as well as to navigate logistical considerations for accessing necessary care. The possibility for outpatient therapy is rapidly evolving, potentially easing these concerns in the future.3 Patients with high disease burden prior to CAR T-cell treatment or with rapid disease progression present unique challenges, as uncontrolled progression during the manufacturing window may preclude infusion.4 Efforts to streamline manufacturing and scheduling have improved access but have not fully eliminated disparities.5

The bridging period between apheresis and infusion requires careful therapeutic management to stabilize disease and preserve eligibility.4,6 This reduction in disease burden also has a possible important impact on the reduction of CAR T-associated toxicities following infusion.4,6There are important considerations for comorbidities that increase risk for adverse events as well; achieving cytoreduction prior to infusion may mitigate cytokine release syndrome and other immune-mediated toxicities.4,6 Despite the remarkable efficacy of cellular therapy, disease progression during bridging remains common, and optimal strategies to minimize this progression while preserving CAR T eligibility and reducing toxicity in RRMM require further investigation.6

Bone marrow assessment prior to, and sometimes following, bridging therapy is often necessary to gauge treatment response and guide intensity.6 One full cycle of bridging therapy is typically recommended prior to CAR T infusion, with a washout of at least seven days between bridging cessation and lymphodepletion.6 This differs from holding therapy where treatment is administered prior to apheresis, and may continue alongside bridging therapy in treatment-responsive patients.6,7

By identifying appropriate candidates, maintaining disease control during preparatory intervals, and preserving mechanistically diverse options for post-cellular therapy management, clinicians can maximize these powerful modalities’ benefits while ensuring comprehensive care throughout the disease trajectory.

Take our Multiple Myeloma quiz to see how your knowledge compares to your peers.

Article Sourcesopen article sources

[1] Sheykhhasan, M., Ahmadieh-Yazdi, A., Vicidomini, R. et al.CAR T therapies in multiple myeloma: unleashing the future. Cancer Gene Ther 31, 667–686 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-024-00750-2

[2] Ailawadhi S, Shune L, Wong SW, Lin Y, Patel K, Jagannath S. Optimizing the CAR T-Cell Therapy Experience in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Pearls From an Expert Roundtable. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24(5):e217-e225. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2024.01.014

[3] Gatwood K, Mahmoudjafari Z, Baer B, et al. Outpatient CAR T-Cell Therapy as Standard of Care: Current Perspectives and Considerations. Clin Hematol Int. 2024;6(2):11-20. Published 2024 Apr 9. doi:10.46989/001c.115793

[4] Amini, L., Silbert, S.K., Maude, S.L. et al.Preparing for CAR T cell therapy: patient selection, bridging therapies and lymphodepletion. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19, 342–355 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-022-00607-3

[5] Ahmed N, Shahzad M, Shippey E, et al. Socioeconomic and racial disparity in chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy access. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022;28(7):358–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.04.008.

[6] Hwa YL, Doss D, Mangan PA, Faber MC, Catamero DD. Understanding the Role and Clinical Management of Bridging Therapy During CAR T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. J Adv Pract Oncol. Published online September 2, 2025. doi:10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.7.25

[7] Khouri J, Sborov D, Rossi A, et al. Focusing on Selinexor for Holding and Bridging Prior to CAR-T in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Med. 2025;14(12):4071. Published 2025 Jun 9. doi:10.3390/jcm14124071

ADVERTISMENT